Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1668 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - €74.44 vs €357.63
- Up to 73% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-12900KF - €0.37 vs €1.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 28% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen 5 1600X - 258 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 24 vs 12 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
201
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
258
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.39/FPS
27%
Price, €
€357.63
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €357.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |