Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 2380 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - €210.04 vs €471.07
- Up to 47% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i9-14900K - €1.04 vs €1.97 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 19% better in Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen 5 1600 - 239 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
201
84%
Value, €/FPS
€1.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€210.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €210.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7307 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
239
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.97/FPS
53%
Price, €
€471.07
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for €471.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7580 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |