Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1750 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 1600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 1600 - 205 vs 180 FPS
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600 - €87.90 vs €210.04
- Up to 63% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 1600 - €0.43 vs €1.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 58 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €210.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7252 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€87.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €87.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7526 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |