The Ryzen 5 1400 is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Xeon E5-1620 v4. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 1400
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of the Xeon E5-1620 v4
- A faster CPU for gaming
Ryzen 5 1400 vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 5 1400
Apr 11th, 2017
Average FPS
177
98%
Min 1% FPS
118
98%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Average FPS
180
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 5 1400 vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 1400 vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 5 1400 vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 5 1400
Apr 11th, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 5 1400 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
$169.00 | MSRP | $294.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
65 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 10 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
