Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 471 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G.
Advantages of Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - €147.05 vs €433.75
- Up to 62% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-12900K - €0.35 vs €0.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - 474 vs 417 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - 24 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
417
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€147.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €147.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
474
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
38%
Price, €
€433.75
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for €433.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |