Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1380 days newer than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of Ryzen 3 3250U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 31% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen 3 3250U - 160 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 32 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€485
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €485 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |