The Ryzen 3 3200G is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-10900K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 4 threads
Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i9-10900K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
179
92%
Min 1% FPS
119
93%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
194
100%
Min 1% FPS
128
100%
Price, €
€493.83
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.54/FPS
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i9-10900K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i9-10900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i9-10900K in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
75%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 3 3200G | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $547.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.3 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 20 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
