The Ryzen 3 3100 is a much faster gaming CPU than the Xeon E5-2699A v4. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3100
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 65 vs 145 Watts
Advantages of the Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 44 vs 8 threads
Ryzen 3 3100 vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 3 3100
Apr 24th, 2020
Average FPS
188
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, €
€55.97
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
181
96%
Min 1% FPS
120
97%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 3 3100 vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 3 3100 vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 3 3100 vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 3 3100
Apr 24th, 2020
Cores
4-core
18%
L3 Cache
16 MB
29%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Cores
22-core
100%
L3 Cache
55 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 3 3100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
$99.00 | MSRP | $4,938.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
| Matisse | Codename | Broadwell |
65 W | Power Consumption | 145 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 22 |
| 8 | Threads | 44 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 16 MB | L3 Cache | 55 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
