Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 1200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 1888 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of Ryzen 3 1200
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - €130.75 vs €399.00
- Up to 56% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-13700K - €1.32 vs €2.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 35% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 1200 - 134 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 24 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
99
74%
Value, €/FPS
€1.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€130.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €130.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7298 minutes ago
Buy for €399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7571 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 1200 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |