Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 5052 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Phenom X4 9650
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 9% better in Metro Exodus than Phenom X4 9650 - 150 vs 138 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 58 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 8 vs 4 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
150
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i3 |
Agena | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 58 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |