The Phenom X4 9650 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-10100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Phenom X4 9650
The Core i3-10100 is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i3-10100
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Phenom X4 9650 vs Core i3-10100 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Phenom X4 9650
Mar 27th, 2008
Average FPS
163
88%
Min 1% FPS
110
89%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, €
€96.79
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Phenom X4 9650 vs Core i3-10100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Phenom X4 9650 vs Core i3-10100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Phenom X4 9650 vs Core i3-10100 in core CPU performance specifications
Phenom X4 9650
Mar 27th, 2008
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
2 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Phenom X4 9650 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Agena | Codename | Comet Lake |
95 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 GHz |
2 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
unknown | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |