Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 5297 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of Phenom X4 9550
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 14% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Phenom X4 9550 - 167 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 20 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€222.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €222.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1151 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Agena | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |