Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 2256 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Pentium G4400
- Up to 99% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - €5.99 vs €419.99
- Up to 98% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-12900K - €0.05 vs €2.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 30% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium G4400 - 155 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 24 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
119
77%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€5.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €5.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7776 minutes ago
Buy for €419.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7777 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4400 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |