Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13500T outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13500T is 4707 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500T
- Performs up to 28% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon X5680 - 148 vs 116 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon X5680
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Core i5-13500T
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon X5680
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Single-Core
530
23.31720193576771%
Multi-Core
2448
25.563909774436087%
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | Intel Core i5-13500T |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 14 |
| 12 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.6 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 16.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
