Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10875H outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10875H is 3335 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10875H
- Performs up to 6% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon X5675 - 123 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon X5675
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Core i7-10875H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Core i7-10875H |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2020 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
