Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 2425 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 5% better in Fortnite than Xeon X5675 - 224 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon X5675
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Core i3-8100
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
