Buy on Amazon
€63.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Xeon X5550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2836 days newer than Xeon X5550.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5550
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 2% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Xeon X5550 - 227 vs 223 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon X5550 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5550 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel BX80677G3930 Processore Celeron G3930, S 1151, Kaby Lake, Dual Core, 2 Thread, 2.9GHz, 2MB Cache, 1050MHz GPU, 51W, Argento
Buy for €63.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65466 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon X5550
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5550 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
| Gainestown | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.