Key Differences
In short — Xeon w9-3475X outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon w9-3475X is 3082 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon w9-3475X
- Performs up to 17% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 757 vs 647 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 72 vs 8 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon w9-3475X
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
922
45.93921275535625%
Multi-Core
3652
20.61995370108972%
Intel Xeon w9-3475X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Feb 15th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Sapphire Rapids | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 4677 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
36 | Cores | 8 |
72 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 135 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
