Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon W3690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2804 days newer than Xeon W3690.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 17% better in Alan Wake 2 than Xeon W3690 - 117 vs 100 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon W3690 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3690 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
117
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€438.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €438.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3690 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Gulftown | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |