Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670T outperforms Xeon W3690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670T is 839 days newer than Xeon W3690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670T
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon W3690 - 124 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Xeon W3690 - 45 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3690 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670T |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Gulftown | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 45 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |