Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Xeon W3690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 2621 days newer than Xeon W3690.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 8% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon W3690 - 127 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3690 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3690 - 16 vs 12 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon W3690
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3690 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Gulftown | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
