Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 3090 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3680
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 12% better in Far Cry 3 than Xeon W3680 - 138 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3680 - 32 vs 12 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Single-Core
555
43.942992874109265%
Multi-Core
2540
30.46294075317822%
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
