Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Xeon W3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 2954 days newer than Xeon W3550.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3550
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 130 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 10% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Xeon W3550 - 247 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3550 - 24 vs 8 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon W3550
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
