Key Differences
In short — Xeon W3550 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W3550 is 1575 days older than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3550
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon W3550 - 53 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3550 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
Bloomfield | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 53 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |