Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms Xeon W3530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 4018 days newer than Xeon W3530.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 11% better in Fortnite than Xeon W3530 - 236 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3530 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3530 - 12 vs 8 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon W3530
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i5-11600
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3530 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
