Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Xeon W3530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 4677 days newer than Xeon W3530.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 32% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon W3530 - 155 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Xeon W3530 - 120 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3530 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3530 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
155
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.99/FPS
100%
Price, €
€463.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €463.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3530 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 120 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |