Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 2619 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3520
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 130 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 5% better in Death Stranding than Xeon W3520 - 223 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 16 vs 8 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
223
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 140 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |