Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 3241 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon W3520 - 214 vs 211 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
214
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€111.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €111.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |