Key Differences
In short — Xeon w3-2425 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon w3-2425 is 1409 days newer than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon w3-2425
- Performs up to 15% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U - 185 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon w3-2425 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon w3-2425
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Single-Core
866
47.792494481236204%
Multi-Core
2541
31.6241443683883%
Intel Xeon w3-2425 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U |
|---|---|---|
Feb 15th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sapphire Rapids | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 4677 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 15 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
