Key Differences
In short — Xeon w3-2425 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon w3-2425 is 1183 days newer than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon w3-2425
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Athlon 3000G - 203 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon w3-2425 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
200
98.52216748768473%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58014 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
52.81456953642384%
Multi-Core
1975
24.579962663347853%
Intel Xeon w3-2425 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Feb 15th, 2023 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Xeon W | Collection | Athlon |
Sapphire Rapids | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 4677 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |