Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Xeon W-3175X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 456 days newer than Xeon W-3175X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 56 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon W-3175X - 181 vs 176 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 65 vs 255 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€288.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €288.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon W | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 10 |
56 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
255 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |