Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 1247 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 33% better in Far Cry 6 than Celeron G3900 - 126 vs 95 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 56 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 51 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon W | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 2 |
56 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
255 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |