Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon W-3175X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1435 days newer than Xeon W-3175X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 56 vs 32 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 19% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon W-3175X - 222 vs 187 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 120 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
222
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€719.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €719.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon W | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 16 |
56 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
255 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |