Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-2125 outperforms Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-2125 is 728 days newer than Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2125
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-6100 - 185 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2125 - 51 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2125 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
183
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€168.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €168.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13692 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-2125 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon W | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |