Buy on Amazon
€8.2
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3220 outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3220 is 1265 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3220 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3220
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E5645 - 209 vs 205 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Xeon E5645 - 53 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G3220
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
209
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€8.2
100%
FPS and Value Winner
BQTEC Intel Pentium G3220 3.00 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 3 MB Cache 53 W CPU Processore LGA 1150
Buy for €8.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Pentium G3220
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Pentium G3220 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Xeon | Collection | Pentium |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
