Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 3325 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 15% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E5645 - 132 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E5645 - 35 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5645 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i9-9900T
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900T |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
