Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10300H outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10300H is 3838 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10300H - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10300H
- Performs up to 6% better in Deathloop than Xeon E5645 - 177 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Xeon E5645 - 45 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i5-10300H
Mobile • Sep 17th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Core i5-10300H |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 17th, 2020 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
