Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 4333 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 30% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5645 - 147 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E5645 - 58 vs 80 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€87.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €87.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |