Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7945HX is 4677 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
- Performs up to 15% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E5645 - 338 vs 295 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Xeon E5645 - 55 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5645 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Ryzen 9 7945HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Single-Core
359
13.14536799707067%
Multi-Core
1681
10.675727168804777%
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Dragon Range |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
