Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 3766 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 58% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5645 - 199 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5645 - 24 vs 12 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Single-Core
359
20.763447079236553%
Multi-Core
1681
16.75972083748754%
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
