Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7960X outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7960X is 2726 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Core i9-7960X - 80 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7960X
- Performs up to 6% better in Deathloop than Xeon E5620 - 177 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 32 vs 8 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i9-7960X
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i9-7960X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
