Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2400 outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2400 is 299 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 80 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Performs up to 5% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Xeon E5620 - 61 vs 58 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
