Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 4312 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 12% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E5620 - 329 vs 295 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5620 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
329
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€214
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €214 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i5-12500 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |