Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 2890 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 3% better in Dishonored 2 than Xeon E5620 - 261 vs 254 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5620 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Ryzen 3 2200G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
