Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Xeon E5530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 1988 days newer than Xeon E5530.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5530
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 80 vs 85 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5530 - 173 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5530 - 12 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5530 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Xeon | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Gainestown | Codename | Haswell-E |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 85 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |