Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms Xeon E5530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 5028 days newer than Xeon E5530.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 31% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5530 - 148 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5530 - 60 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5530 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
148
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€170.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €170.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5530 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Gainestown | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 60 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |