Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600T outperforms Xeon E5520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600T is 5028 days newer than Xeon E5520.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600T
- Performs up to 41% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5520 - 124 vs 88 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5520 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Core i5-13600T
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Single-Core
348
14.770797962648558%
Multi-Core
1454
11.843284189948685%
Intel Xeon E5520 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600T |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Gainestown | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 14 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
