Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms Xeon E5520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 2836 days newer than Xeon E5520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5520
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 26% better in Far Cry 6 than Xeon E5520 - 111 vs 88 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E5520 - 35 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Core i3-7100T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5520 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
| Gainestown | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
