Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Xeon E5520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 4117 days newer than Xeon E5520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5520
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 13% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5520 - 281 vs 248 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5520 - 24 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
281
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€579.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €579.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17870 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5520 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Gainestown | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |