Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Pentium Gold G5400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 524 days older than Pentium Gold G5400.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Pentium Gold G5400 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G5400 - 44 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 58 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Pentium Gold G5400
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium Gold G5400
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
731
62.21276595744681%
Multi-Core
1504
15.635720968915686%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G5400 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
| Broadwell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 2 |
44 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 145 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
